 |
| Foreign Spies Stealing U.S. Military Secrets from Inside Defense Plants |
Espionage isn’t all tuxedos, shaken
martinis, and rooftop chases. It’s much quieter than that—more clipboard than
car chase. In the modern era of spycraft, the most dangerous operative doesn’t
carry a silenced pistol — he carries a lunchbox and a tool belt. He wears
steel-toe boots, clocks in on time, and knows everyone’s name in the breakroom.
And maybe — just maybe — he isn’t there to fix HVAC units. Maybe he’s there to
catch a mole.
It’s a provocative idea: could the CIA
embed operatives under deep cover inside U.S. defense plants, disguised as
ordinary workers, to root out foreign spies who’ve slipped through the cracks?
Or — if they’re not doing it already — should they be?
That’s the kind of premise brought to life
in the short-story thriller The Hunt For A Russian Spy, where CIA spymaster Corey Pearson
disappears into a new identity to infiltrate Boeing’s defense division. Under
the alias “Brian Carter,” a junior maintenance tech, Corey trades tactical
briefings for blue-collar labor — sweeping floors, unclogging drains, and
monitoring a Russian mole who’s dangerously close to stealing blueprints for
America’s next-generation stealth surveillance aircraft.
Nothing flashy. No spotlight. Just another
guy fixing pipes and staying invisible. But that’s the whole point. Because in
real-world spycraft, access without attention is everything.
And while the idea of CIA agents working
deep undercover on U.S. soil might sound like pure fiction, the real question
is: how far from reality is it?
Officially,
the CIA doesn’t operate like this. Legally, it can’t — at least not without
serious oversight. The CIA is restricted by the National Security Act of 1947
and Executive Order 12333, which prohibit it from engaging in domestic law
enforcement or surveillance on U.S. citizens.
That job falls to the FBI, which leads
counterintelligence efforts inside the U.S., particularly in high-risk sectors
like defense, aerospace, and advanced technologies. The FBI, often in
partnership with the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA),
investigates suspected foreign moles, handles background checks for
contractors, and oversees security protocols in companies that handle
classified materials.
So, on paper, there’s no mission patch for
“Undercover Maintenance Guy – CIA.” But the real world isn’t always confined to
paper.
There are circumstances — highly
sensitive, deeply classified circumstances — in which intelligence agencies
work together across legal boundaries, particularly when foreign espionage is
involved. If, for example, a suspected spy working inside a U.S. defense plant
was believed to be actively collaborating with a hostile foreign government,
the CIA could legally be brought into a joint operation. Especially if foreign
nationals, overseas networks, or global assets are part of the picture.
In those gray areas, the line between
foreign and domestic threats blurs — and so does the line between which
agencies are involved. That opens the door, at least speculatively, for
scenarios like the one Corey Pearson finds himself in.
To be clear, foreign spies are absolutely
targeting U.S. defense companies. It’s not theory — it’s history.
In 2016, a Boeing satellite engineer named
Gregory Allen Justice was caught trying to sell sensitive military
communications technology to someone he believed was a Russian agent. The agent
was actually an FBI undercover operative. Justice claimed he was motivated by
love for a sick woman he met online — a persona created by the FBI to reel him
in.
In 2018, Chinese intelligence officer
Yanjun Xu was lured to Belgium, arrested, and extradited to the U.S. for trying
to steal aviation secrets from GE. The case revealed years of espionage
targeting America’s aerospace and defense contractors, using a mix of cyber
infiltration and human assets.
There are others — Kevin Patrick Mallory,
a former U.S. intelligence officer who sold secrets to China. Jerry Chun Shing
Lee, another ex-CIA officer who helped dismantle U.S. spy networks overseas.
The list goes on.
The espionage threat isn’t hypothetical.
It’s operational. And in many of these cases, the spies weren’t breaking in —
they were already inside. Employees. Engineers. Analysts. Insiders with access.
Which begs the question: if the enemy is
embedding human assets inside our defense contractors, should we be doing the
same to fight back?
The U.S. already runs undercover
operations through the FBI — placing agents in universities, private companies,
and even foreign government-linked firms to intercept espionage attempts. But
FBI agents are law enforcement officers first. They’re investigators, not
infiltrators. Their covers tend to be thin, short-term, and legally safe.
What the CIA brings to the table is
deeper.
In The Hunt For A Russian Spy,
Corey Pearson’s alias — “Brian Carter” — isn’t just a name. It’s a full legend:
military service history, employment records, social security files, driver’s
license, even an online presence and behavioral backstory. He carries himself
like an Air Force mechanic because he was trained to. He uses the right slang,
makes the right calluses, and walks the walk — all the way down to
grease-stained hands and weekend fishing plans.
That’s how CIA undercover work operates
overseas. Could it — and should it — operate that way here?
Imagine a CIA-trained asset embedded for
months or even years inside a high-value defense facility. Not watching from a distance
but observing up close. Not flipping targets, but quietly identifying them,
mapping networks, and feeding intelligence to operational teams. The kind of
long-game infiltration foreign services have used against us for decades.
It’s not about kicking down doors. It’s
about being invisible until you’re the only one who sees what’s really
happening.
The danger, of course, is legal overreach.
The U.S. intelligence community was burned badly in the 1970s for domestic
spying. Congressional reforms and oversight were put in place for good reason.
The idea of turning the CIA inward, even in a targeted way, raises legitimate
concerns about surveillance, civil liberties, and accountability.
But national security has evolved. The
battlefield is no longer just overseas — it’s embedded in our infrastructure,
our tech labs, our defense plants. The adversaries aren’t always hackers or
drones. Sometimes, they’re engineers. Sometimes, they’re janitors. Sometimes,
they’re not who they say they are.
If we want to catch spies, we may need to
start thinking like them.
That’s what makes The Hunt For A Russian Spy
feel less like fiction and more like a preview. Pearson doesn’t save the world
with explosions or exotic gadgets. He saves it by blending in, digging deep,
and seeing what no one else can. He’s not pretending to be Brian Carter — he is
Brian Carter. And in today’s threat environment, that kind of infiltration
might not be just useful… it might be essential.
So, could the CIA be placing operatives
undercover in U.S. defense plants?
Officially — no.
Unofficially?
You might want to take a second look at
the guy fixing the water line in the restricted wing. He might not be here for
the plumbing.
Robert
Morton is a member of the Association of Former Intelligence
Officers (AFIO) and writes about the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). He also
writes the Corey
Pearson- CIA Spymaster Series, which blends his knowledge of real-life
intelligence operations with gripping fictional storytelling. His thrillers
reveal the shadowy world of covert missions and betrayal with striking realism.