![]() |
When trust is the only currency, one defector’s fear meets the calm of a CIA operative who knows what’s at stake |
Trust
is a funny thing. You don’t notice it until it’s gone—and when it breaks, it
breaks hard.
Case in point: Oleg Smolenkov. You
might’ve heard his name in passing, maybe in whispers tied to the CIA. Well, it
turns out the Kremlin recently admitted he did work inside Russia’s
presidential administration. That’s no small thing.
Now, they’re quick to say he wasn’t close
to Putin—just another bureaucrat. But here’s what we know: Smolenkov was no
paper-pusher. He was the CIA’s man on the inside. For years, he fed Washington
top-shelf secrets—stuff he pulled straight off Putin’s desk. We’re talking
classified memos, photos, high-level chatter.
He was the CIA’s eyes and ears in the
heart of enemy territory. And in 2017, when things got too hot—thanks in part
to concerns that President Trump might leak something he shouldn’t—Smolenkov
vanished. Extracted. Gone. Just like that.
He was the kind of spy you don’t get
twice. And when he disappeared, a big part of America’s window into the Kremlin
disappeared with him.
Oleg Smolenkov’s real-life escape reads
like something pulled straight out of Mission
of Vengeance, my latest spy thriller. In it, a
former KGB officer named Yury Bocharov defects to the U.S. and gets tucked into
the CIA’s Witness Protection Program. But there’s a twist—his handler, Corey
Pearson, isn’t buying it. Is Bocharov really on our side, or is he a plant,
sent by Russian intelligence to play the long con?
If that sounds familiar, it should.
Smolenkov’s extraction set off the same alarm bells. He vanished from Moscow
just as foreign interference was ramping up, and his disappearance punched a
hole straight through America’s intelligence net. One day we had eyes inside
Putin’s inner circle—the next, we were flying blind.
Here’s the kicker: Smolenkov didn’t just
leak gossip. His intel tied Putin personally to the DNC hack and the 2016
election interference—stuff that shifted history. Some sources called him the
CIA’s most valuable asset since Cold War legend Adolf Tolkachev. When they
yanked him, they lost their window into the Kremlin—right when Russia was
ramping up again.
Now fast-forward to today, and the U.S.
intelligence world is shaking on its foundations. The Trump administration
recently scrapped a key task force that was pressuring Russia, then swung the
axe on over 1,200 CIA jobs. Other agencies like the NSA and DIA didn’t fare
much better—thousands more pink slips handed out like flyers.
And then came “Signalgate.” A private
group chat on the Signal app—meant for top-level national security
chatter—accidentally included a reporter. Next thing you know, sensitive war
plans were out in the open.
This isn’t just sloppy. It’s dangerous.
These aren’t little cracks in the system—they’re full-on fractures. Trust
between intel agencies is crumbling. Coordination is slipping. And our foreign
allies? They’re watching it all happen and backing away, wondering if the U.S.
can still be counted on.
Remember, intelligence thrives on trust.
Allies pool info all the time—Russia’s meddling in Ukraine and elections, cyber‑attacks,
nuclear threats. The U.S. is already freezing intel sharing with Ukraine after
Trump suspended aid. Now, NATO partners are watching Washington’s every
move—furrowing their brows as doors close and the cold shoulder sets in. Trust,
once gone, doesn’t snap back overnight.
What’s even more unsettling? Trump’s
attitude toward intelligence itself.
He’s
brushed off critical assessments—like Iran’s nuclear threat—with a shrug and a
soundbite. When the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, testified
on the risk, Trump flat-out said, “I don’t care what she said.” Just
like that.
And the appointments? They’ve brought
chaos in their wake. John Ratcliffe took over the CIA, Gabbard stepped in as
DNI, and almost immediately, basic security protocols got sloppy. The White
House received unclassified emails listing new CIA hires—names that should’ve
been protected.
On top of that, they’ve started gutting
diversity and inclusion programs across the intel community. Doesn’t sound like
much on its own, but stack it all together and you’ve got a slow, steady
dismantling of an already-fragile system.
It’s death by a thousand cuts. And it’s
happening in real time.
This isn’t some academic argument or a
Beltway squabble—it’s a real-world threat with real-world consequences. When
intel agencies stop trusting each other, stop sharing what they know, bad guys
slip through the cracks. And they’re not just watching—they’re striking.
Russia’s already in the game, using AI to
spread lies, sabotage systems, and launch pinpoint cyberattacks. And they’re
not alone.
According to the latest ODNI Threat
Assessment, we’re getting poked and prodded by the full lineup: Russia, China,
Iran, North Korea. Sometimes they’re acting solo, sometimes as a tag team. But
the goal’s the same—disrupt, destabilize, and damage.
And if our own house stays divided, they
won’t need to do much more. We’ll hand them the opening.
So yes, Oleg Smolenkov was brave. He took
the ultimate risk, traded inside secrets to keep us safe, and then vanished
into suburban life in witness protection. His sacrifice deserves more than a
cameo—it underscores why close-knit intel bonds matter. In the world of
cloak-and-dagger and real-world geopolitics, you can’t outsmart what you can’t
see.
And when the White House chips away at the
foundations of trust—with dismissals, leaks, disbanding —they’re not just
stirring rumors. They’re risking another blind spot. Another Missed sign.
Another crisis cooked up in secret labs of authoritarian rivals.
So if you dive into Mission of Vengeance,
remember: it's more than fiction. It's a reminder—what happens in spy stories
matters, because the lines between page and reality are thinner than we think.
And unless doubts are restored, until trust is rebuilt—between U.S. agencies,
with allies, and across intel-sharing platforms—Americans will keep facing
threats they can’t even see coming.
Robert Morton is a member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO) and writes about the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). He also writes the Corey Pearson- CIA Spymaster Series, which blends his knowledge of real-life intelligence operations with gripping fictional storytelling. His work offers readers an insider’s glimpse into the world of espionage, inspired by the complexities and high-stakes realities of the intelligence community.
No comments:
Post a Comment