Cyber Threats, Russia, China, and Border Security: Where's the Debate? |
Let’s face it: It’s more than disappointing that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump aren’t debating key national security issues. It’s downright unfortunate for the American public. With cybersecurity threats, the growing Russia-China military alliance, and ongoing concerns about border security at the forefront, these critical issues must be addressed directly through debate.
The American people need to see how the
next POTUS will tackle these challenges. Without an open discussion on these
topics, it’s not just a missed opportunity—it’s a national security threat. The
public deserves a clear understanding of where these candidates stand on
matters that impact our safety and future stability. Without that debate, we’re
left dangerously in the dark.
Let’s break it down. First off,
cybersecurity. It’s no secret that cyberattacks are increasing by the day. From
ransomware to state-sponsored hacking, America’s infrastructure is constantly
under siege. Russian hackers have targeted pipelines, and Chinese
cyber-espionage continues to be a threat.
You’d think this would be front and center
in a debate between the candidates, right? How would each of them bolster our
defenses? What’s their strategy to protect American businesses, our electoral
system, and critical infrastructure? Without that dialogue, we can’t fully
understand how they plan to safeguard the nation. And that poses a real
national security threat.
Kamala Harris has spoken out in interviews
about her approach to cybersecurity, border security, and the growing
Russia-China alliance. She’s laid out her plan. But without a debate, we don’t
get the full picture—how does Donald Trump plan to address these threats? A
debate is crucial to hearing how Trump’s plans compare to Harris’s. Without it,
we’re left guessing how the next president will protect the country, and that
uncertainty is dangerous.
Now, consider the Russia-China military
alliance. These two powers are no longer just competitors—they’re working
together in ways that directly challenge U.S. interests. Joint military
exercises in the Indo-Pacific are troubling enough, but their collaboration
extends to Europe and the Arctic.
Two of America’s biggest rivals are pooling resources and sharing intelligence. Let that sink in. Meanwhile, there’s no debate on how either Harris or Trump would counter this growing threat. If that doesn’t scream “national security risk,” what does?
Get ‘MISSION
OF VENGEANCE’ now and take a journey of espionage and
intrigue with CIA operative Corey Pearson.
Here we are—no debate, no dialogue.
Instead of putting these critical issues front and center, the American public
is left wondering and hoping for real answers. Sure, we get sound bites and
campaign promises, but that’s not enough. We need an in-depth, head-to-head
debate to really understand how each candidate plans to protect the nation. The
stakes are too high for silence, and when there’s no discussion, it’s not just
a missed opportunity—it’s a national security threat.
Mr. Trump, it’s time to reconsider your
refusal to debate Kamala Harris. The American people need clarity on how you
plan to address these threats. Without this dialogue, we’re left speculating
about the future of our national security—and that’s not just unfortunate, it’s
unacceptable. It’s a threat to the safety and security of every American.
The reality is, while Harris has been offering specific plans and concrete policies on these critical issues, it’s time for Trump to lay out his plans and explain how they compare to hers. The American people deserve to hear him detail exactly how his strategies will protect the country and, more importantly, how they are better than the plans already on the table. Until we have that debate, voters are left in the dark. And that’s not just unfortunate—it’s unacceptable.
Robert Morton is a member of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO) and the author of the "Corey Pearson- CIA Spymaster" spy thriller series. Check out his latest spy thriller, Misson of Vengeance.
No comments:
Post a Comment